Saturday, December 7, 2013

article reflection

1. The project that I decided to review was that by Dana Wolbert and her idea of Natural Beauty.

2. I selected this exhibit for my interest in nature and how I see many things around me as being beautiful. So I was curious to see how she interpreted nature and its beauty which she did with things like humans and realistic sculptures what I really enjoyed to see.

3. I really didn't come across any problems when critiquing this exhibit. She did everything the same way which I would have done this exhibit if it were mine to create.

4. When it comes to critiquing fellow peers I think it is perfectly fine since we do it anyways when class discussions are held, everyone has a right or wrong opinion to everything. So why not critique a students work since it will only help them grow strong when it comes to future projects so they can get a better grade by fixing mistakes.

5. Of course I would like to read over peer reviews since it will only be beneficial to me if my peer review was truthful and well thought about in helping me as a student grow.

6. I would have to say my review is a 7-8 since I lack the artistic background that some one who would professional write an article with more proper terminology than I hold. 

7. This project wasn't to bad to do. However I did enjoy some of the other projects we created this semester more.

No comments:

Post a Comment